It’s why the speaker of the House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, has said Republicans are “likely to take a scalpel but not a sledgehammer” to the IRA, Umunna said. “To be honest, whatever you think about climate change, the one thing where there is consensus is that we need more energy and we need it in abundance.”
And that will require more electrification and more renewables, he said.
Trump himself has made clear he regards the climate policies of his predecessor with derision, referring to the idea of climate change as a “hoax” and instead embracing the fossil-fuel industry with a mantra of “drill baby drill”.
What’s more, the net zero goal to which a lot of green investing is pegged has been dubbed “terrible” by Trump’s energy secretary.
See also: Building Asia’s low-carbon industrial future
Despite such political rhetoric, the direction that US policy is now taking does “not necessarily” mean the US is becoming a less desirable destination for green investments, Umunna said.
In the same interview, the JPMorgan executive said that Europe’s intensified focus on defense spending shouldn’t take the bloc’s attention away from the green transition, which he described as key to national security.
“To separate out the need for energy from your defense and national security capabilities is probably not very wise,” Umunna said.
See also: SIA’s record Scope 1, 2 emissions keep Temasek’s FY2025 portfolio emissions flat y-o-y
At the same time, he underlined the need to steer investment toward assets and sectors that can generate profits.
“It’s got to deliver a return,” Umunna said. “There are very few, if any, investors who are prepared to sacrifice a decent return — total shareholder return — for sustainability. They are investing in this space because they see it as delivering profitability, adding value. This isn’t like altruism.”
