The accusations involve the terms of an agreement from 2017 for UOB and other lenders to grant loan facilities of up to HK$10 billion (US$1.3 billion) to group entity Adventure Success Ltd. The terms were meant to secure the obligations of the unit, which holds a private residential land development project in Hong Kong’s Kowloon area.
Luxury builder Shimao, which ranked as China’s 22nd biggest by sales in the first half of this year, was once considered one of the country’s stronger developers. But it’s been trading at deeply distressed levels in the dollar bond market for months now. The company also suffered its first-ever default on a public note earlier this month, when it missed payment on a US$1 billion security.
Shimao's dollar bonds have been trading at stressed levels for months
See also: Singapore bank bonds can stand tall in 2H2025 on flight to quality
Shimao is among a growing number of real estate firms whose troubles have been mounting from last year, amid a sector-wide liquidity crunch sparked by a government crackdown on excessive borrowing and housing speculation that’s sent defaults to a record.
The developer’s public relations department declined to comment. A spokesperson at UOB also declined to comment.
Shimao, whose landmark projects included five-star hotels in Shanghai, was once considered largely immune to the sweeping crackdown that has engulfed larger peers like China Evergrande Group and Sunac China Holdings. But it now faces challenges from several creditors’ group.
See also: Bank of Singapore launches new asset allocation framework amid heightened global market volatility
Documents laying out the terms of the loan facilities included a so-called share charge – a kind of pledge – for another subsidiary Genuine Victory Holding’s 100% holding in Adventure Success, according to the writ.
UOB alleged that the re-allocation of inter-companies loans, as well as allotment of shares that occurred on or around May 26 this year, led to Genuine Victory’s holding in Adventure Success being reduced to about 5.4% from 100%.
The bank demanded that the re-allocation and the allotment of the shares be set aside, among other claims.
