This pipeline is a clear sign of confidence. It also raises the stakes for project delivery. When demand stays high, the industry needs more than technical capacity. It needs supply chains that can manage uncertainty, absorb pressure and solve problems early.
Against this backdrop, Singapore has demonstrated its market leadership in project delivery. NEC Contracts’ recent research found that 64% of built environment professionals in Singapore said more than half of their projects over the past three years were delivered on time and to budget. This was the highest figure of any market surveyed across the UK, Australia, Peru and Hong Kong.
That should give the industry confidence. It also creates a useful question: What is Singapore doing well, and how can it build on that advantage?
Part of the answer lies in the maturity of Singapore’s project environment. Clients here, particularly in the public sector, have played a major role in setting expectations around planning, governance, procurement and delivery discipline. When client leadership is clear, project teams are better able to align around outcomes from the outset. This helps explain why Singapore outperforms many markets on delivery.
Yet the same research also shows that strong delivery performance does not mean the system is free from friction. In Singapore, 61% of respondents agreed that built environment projects create inherently adversarial supply chains, while 78% said poor supply chain relationships risk business continuity.
These findings matter because they point to a deeper challenge. Singapore may be delivering comparatively well, but many of the relationships behind those projects remain under strain.
The causes are familiar to anyone working in the sector. Singapore respondents identified uncontrolled scope changes and poor estimating as the leading causes of business instability, financial stress and disputes. Inflationary pressures and a late payment culture also remain significant concerns.
See also: Global Resource Construction’s subsidiary secures $757 million enhancement works contract
These issues can quickly push parties into defensive behaviour. When margins are tight, risk is uncertain and changes are frequent, supply chain partners may focus on protecting their own position rather than solving problems together.
This is how adversarial dynamics persist, even in a high-performing market. The issue is rarely a lack of professional intent. Most people in the industry understand the value of working constructively. In Singapore, respondents placed high value on trust, communication, clear processes and positive supply chain relationships as ways to improve outcomes and minimise disputes.
The gap is between belief and practice. Only around a third of Singapore respondents had worked on projects using collaborative contracts, despite broad support for their wider adoption. At the same time, most still operate within traditional contracting frameworks, which are structured around rigid roles and divided responsibilities and tend to be adversarial in nature.
This is a critical point for Singapore’s next phase of built environment development. If clients shape the contracting environment, clients also have the power to improve it. The industry already has strong delivery foundations. The opportunity now is to make collaboration more consistent, structured and commercially meaningful.
Collaborative contracting approaches can help because they set expectations early. They encourage parties to share information, identify risks sooner and resolve issues before they escalate into formal disputes. This is especially important in complex projects, where uncertainty is inevitable and rigid risk transfer can create combative outcomes.
The commercial case is becoming harder to ignore. Collaborative contracting gives project teams a practical structure for dealing with uncertainty before it becomes a dispute. By encouraging earlier conversations about risk, cost, programme and change, it helps parties make better decisions while there is still time to act. For businesses, this can mean fewer surprises, more predictable delivery and a stronger basis for protecting margins while preserving the relationships needed for future work.
For developers, contractors, consultants and public agencies, the benefit is not just a smoother project experience. Better collaboration can protect programme certainty, reduce avoidable cost, support healthier supply chains and create stronger long-term value for asset owners and users. When risk is managed openly rather than pushed down the chain, projects become more adaptable. When communication is clearer, disputes become less likely. When trust is supported by the contract itself, teams can focus more energy on delivery.
Singapore’s built environment is entering a period where resilience will matter as much as efficiency. Demand for infrastructure, housing, urban renewal and sustainability upgrades will continue. So will pressure from cost volatility, skills constraints and rising expectations around quality and performance.
The next step is therefore to strengthen Singapore’s delivery discipline with contracting models that make collaboration easier to practise consistently.
Singapore has already shown that strong client leadership can improve project outcomes. The same leadership can now help the sector move from project-by-project collaboration to a more resilient delivery culture. In a market that is already outperforming its peers, that may be the next real advantage.
Renee Paik is head of Asia Pacific at NEC Contracts, an end-to-end portfolio of plain-language contracts for civil engineering works, services and supply
For more property trends and breaking news, visit City & Country’s microsite at theedgesingapore.com/cityandcountry
