Water is our most vital natural resource, but modern societies face increasingly acute challenges in managing and delivering.
Only by determining the true value of water and pricing it in a socially equitable manner according to that need can we generate the required investment to mitigate the global water crisis. This is the crucial question at the heart of Boston Consulting Group’s (BCG) recent publication, What Is Water Really Worth?
The reality of the global water crisis is increasingly stark. The World Bank estimates that since 1970, renewable water resources have decreased by half. At the same time, the UN reports that global demand for water is increasing by 1% annually.
Despite the severity of the crisis, investment in water resources remains inadequate. According to Unicef, achieving universal access to clean drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene services by 2030 will require a fourfold increase in current investment levels, let alone the investment needed for other uses, such as agriculture and industry.
Southeast Asia is a region at the sharp end of this global crisis, facing challenges of too much, too little, and too dirty water.
In a case of “too little”, Malaysia’s Johor — a rapidly developing region in the global competition for data infrastructure — rejected nearly one-third of data centre applications between January and May last year due to fears of overstretching water and power resources.
See also: Trump is cementing the green energy transition he loathes
In Thailand, the business region of Hat Yai was barely spared from flooding that caused over four billion baht of damage across the province in December 2024, showcasing how “too much” is also impacting regional businesses. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, the challenge of “too dirty” is apparent in 70% of rivers, heavily polluted by domestic waste.
These examples reveal the existing impact of water challenges, and without the right intervention, those challenges are only set to get worse.
See also: AllianzGI says first ESG defence allocations likely this year
Changing the flow of water investment
Southeast Asia and the world must address key systemic barriers to overcome water challenges.
We see several key factors which contribute to the underinvestment in water resources. Political, regulatory, and governance challenges complicate the coordination of public investments.
Investment dynamics are also challenging, with high capital costs, long payback periods, and difficulties with monetisation due to regulations and the public, non-financial nature of many benefits, which often deter private investment.
Underpinning these difficulties is the widespread undervaluation and mispricing of water. While these factors are closely linked, they differ in key ways which must be recognised to turn the tap on water investment.
The widespread undervaluation and mispricing of water do not reflect the severity of the growing crisis. At the same time, it promotes the inefficient allocation of water resources and leads to underinvestment in water resources that are critically needed.
In many countries, water is priced well below cost-recovery levels. BCG’s analysis of common water comparison metrics reveals what that looks like in cities of Southeast Asia. Kuala Lumpur prices water at just GBP 0.73 per cubic metre (m3) of water for up to 15 m3 per month, Ho Chi Minh City at 0.23 GBP/m3 and Manila at 0.32 GBP/m3 — substantially lower than the 1.82 GBP/m3 seen globally.
Measuring the value of investment
Appropriately valuing and pricing water isn’t easy. Water provides not only economic value, but also social and environmental benefits. These include enhancing food security, avoiding potential conflicts, and supporting ecosystems. What’s more, the regional examples outlined above show the clear negative impacts that water can trigger for Southeast Asia’s business ecosystem.
Sink your teeth into in-depth insights from our contributors, and dive into financial and economic trends
Recognising and quantifying these broader impacts and then presenting them in ways that can guide pricing and investment decisions is a complex challenge.
Our Water Value Framework is designed to provide a structured approach to assessing the economic, social, and environmental value of water by considering three ways that water creates value: direct use, indirect use, and availability for use in the future.
The tool provides two lenses that can be used to inform decision-making. The first is in measuring total value — this captures the overall value, measured in dollars, generated by water via its contributions to economies, ecosystems and societies.
The second measure is that of marginal value, reflecting the value gained from an additional unit of available water. Marginal value is a particularly useful metric for municipalities and companies building business cases for investments in additional water resources, such as water reuse, storage, or desalination infrastructure.
These benefits are not hypothetical. For example, research from Israel shows that the marginal value of additional water from new desalination plants is US$4 per m3 ($5.15 per m3) based on avoiding economic losses from potential future water shortages.
The appropriate valuation of water is a critical first step to fairly and sustainably pricing water. It is also crucial for turning the tap on investment to build the infrastructure and develop the products and services required to address the water crisis.
One of the most important benefits of improved water valuation is the ability to develop more effective and equitable water pricing and allocation strategies. An accurate assessment of water’s valuation provides policymakers with the information they need to make key strategic decisions. A more detailed look at pricing structures and allocation strategies is considered in the report.
Water scarcity and challenges are also generating a new wave of technological and ecological innovations to consider across three key areas of digital innovation, infrastructure innovation, and emerging solutions.
Water tech is growing fast in importance. In 2023, water tech companies received US$1.2 billion in funding, more than double the pre-pandemic funding levels in 2019.
Appropriately valuing water can accelerate the innovation process by prioritising resource allocation, driving innovation funding, supporting cross-sector collaboration, guiding policy development, and promoting public awareness and engagement.
Turning the tide on Southeast Asia’s water investment
Water is expected to be the most visible side of Southeast Asia’s climate impacts — whether that is too much, too little, or too dirty.
These impacts are not only highly emotive and impactful on daily lives, but they also present fundamental challenges to a fair society and a successful business ecosystem.
Adapting to these impacts will require that water becomes a strategic priority for both the public and private sectors.
Building regional water resilience is vital for both social and economic resilience. In order to achieve this, water must be better valued and priced to attract the needed investment into Southeast Asia’s water sector.
It is time to stop taking water for granted and recognise that, as a region, we need to invest in a sustainable future for this most precious of our shared resources.
Dave Sivaprasad is managing director & partner, Southeast Asia lead, climate and sustainability, at Boston Consulting Group and Dean Muruven is associate director, water, at Boston Consulting Group
